I must admit to liking what I hear from Donald Trump, in spite of a very cautious concern for his "Adolph-Hitler-esque" appeal to desperate voters, who are so sick of the pathetic incompetence of the Democratic candidates (and especially the Obama Administrations concept of "diplomacy") that they seem willing to believe that he will actually do what he says he will, if elected. The rest of the candidates seem so terrified by the legal quagmire of trying to ship all the 12 million illegals back to their home countries that they seem to prefer not to address the subject. (It might be necessary to call for a Constitutional Amendment to relieve the due process legalities for people whose only claim to Constitutional protections was their illegal entrance into the country.)
Now we have the rather unsurprising news that the Iran Nuclear restraint treaty comes with a side-agreement that allows Iran to inspect their own facilities for reported suspicions of violations, rather than the independent international inspectors that we all presumed would oversee inspections. This is tantamount to allowing the "lunatics to run the asylum"!!! What kind of an idiot would agree to such a condition, and honestly call this a treaty? Only a liberal Democrat could try to pass this off as a legitimate accomplishment, as Obama, and Secretary of State John Kerry are trying to do. They can't believe that this will really keep Iran from cheating on the treaty conditions, so it must be assumed that they really don't care if Iran develops a nuclear missile, and blows Israel off the globe. I guess they reason that it will take long enough for Iran to do it that they will be out of office, and safely moved to Switzerland, for retirement before Iran uses their missiles on the United States. After all, they must really hate America as we are now.
And I'm deeply concerned that we may well have 4, to 8 years of another Romper-Room Democrat elected in 2016, to complete the process of turning this country into an effective third-world country! Remember, "good" Socialists believe that it's necessary (and therefore moral) to take from the rich, that the "poor" can have better opportunity. They simply ignore that the poor don't benefit from this "Robin Hood" mentality, because the people who do the "taking" usually also do the "keeping". So what we end up with is the Socialists, who moralize their robbing of the rich, incorporating some method to ensure that the new wealth is distributed by other loyal Socialists, who quietly skim off the top for themselves, while giving a piddling little tip to the genuinely oppressed poor. And we end up with the Socialists robbing from the wealthy producers of society, in order to create their own wealthy class of Socialists, who produce nothing, but new ways to steal other peoples' money. Eventually, the businesses that once created the original wealth become unable to profit under the Socialists' regulation, and taxation, and they go bankrupt. Their failure is not replaced by new businesses because the Socialists' restrictions make it unwise for anyone to try to do business in whatever field used to be profitable, but is no longer. So what you end up with is the "third-world-status" of the nation that used to be the most prosperous in the world! It's looking like that's what we're facing, as the liberals (in both parties) continue to corrupt our economic system for the "greater good" of creating a one-world Socialist system, that will enrich the Antichrist, and his "lackies", at least for seven years, while starving the Christians to death! This system will create a new wealthy class of loyal Socialists, and a new poverty class of Christians (probably those who came to be born-again believers after the "Rapture", only to realize that they were prohibited from receiving the necessary "mark of the Beast" that would allow them to participate in the economy). Good luck to those new elitist Socialists in trying to convince God that they should be allowed into Heaven after their seven-year crime spree! This brings new meaning to the adage, "you can't take it with you!"
No comments:
Post a Comment