Monday, January 25, 2016

Dems Desperate To Defeat Bernie???

The evidence is mounting! Vice President Biden announces his regret at deciding not to run for President, and Hillary Clinton's E-mails are determined to contain some secret information that is considered so sensitive that even some top government officials are not cleared to receive them, secretly, or otherwise. Is this Hillary's "smoking gun"? Will she be the first candidate ever to be indicted in the middle of a Presidential campaign? And will the F.B.I. actually have the guts to stand up to the Obama White House, and demand that the Justice Department indict her??? It's certain that she will never see a moment in jail, even if she's convicted, she'll be pardoned as Nixon was, on some trumped-up technicality. This is all getting to be, "curiouser, and curiouser", to quote that famous Democratic Pollster, Alice, of "Wonderland" fame. At least President Obama has come out to criticize Sanders publicly. This could easily be called Democratic hypocrisy (but not by me,folks, tee hee hee!); Bernie Sanders, the only Congressman with the guts to openly admit that he is a Socialist, being attacked by Democrats who feel it's okay to be a Socialist as long as no one uses that poisonous word around their campaign! (But, someone once said something like, "If it looks like a Socialist, waddles like a Socialist, and quacks like a Socialist,...it's a Socialist!) (With apologies to all the Republican ducks of the world!)

Now we have that bastion of anti-Socialist politics, Michael Bloomberg, saying he is considering a third party run (apparently taking time out from his important work of trying to get New Yorkers to stop buying giant cokes at New York convenience stores). He has reputedly hired some political pollsters to help him decide if it's a good idea, with a decision coming after the New Hampshire primary (translation: In case Bernie actually beats Hillary!). He is contemplating spending as much as a billion dollars of "his own cash" (will he be reimbursed by the Democratic National Committee?) if he decides to run (is this called, "chump change"?). We may have two Billionaires trying to buy the White House, or at least rent it for a few years, Trump and Bloomberg!

If Bloomberg does decide to run as a third party candidate, this could change the whole election picture. Third party candidates have traditionally done well enough to take away votes from their original party front runner, but not enough to actually win. So, is Bloomberg actually trying to win, or is he just trying to see to it that Sanders doesn't? In that case, Trump would seem to be the biggest benefactor of this development. Could he be the one that I have been expecting to get elected, in order to continue America's decline into third-world status, so that God can allow His Antichrist to come to power over a one-world Socialist government, and really mess things up, before Christ comes back to judge the whole world, and establish His Kingdom of Heaven on Earth? Possibly so. Trump's Mussolini-facial-expressions worked once before, and his "Hitlerian" tactics of telling his audiences what they want to hear, in generalities, without specifics on how he plans to accomplish them, also worked well,... briefly!

It looks as though the Democratic party is paranoid at the thought that an admitted Socialist might actually run for President on the Democratic ticket, forever debunking the image of Democratic candidates actually NOT being Socialists, even though all their policies come straight out of Marxist dogma.

Hold on to your hats, folks! It looks like were in for a "bumpy ride", as Bette Davis once said in some movie I can't remember. But as I said before, it's all getting, "curiouser, and curiouser" (thanks Alice!).

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Good Riddance To The "First Fool"!!!

Guess who???

I'll bet none of my regular readers can guess who I'm referring to! Right!!! Congratulations!!! How did you ever guess that I was referring to President Obama, after his pathetic State Of The Union address last night? And of course, I'm calling him the "First", not that he was the first Democratic "Fool" to ever sit in the White House (we've seen Clinton and Carter before him), but in the sense of present, and primary (as in the "First Lady"). Perhaps it would be more accurate if I referred to him as the "Worst Fool"!!!

The term "Fool" I use advisedly, applying my own definition here. I consider a "fool" to be someone who does not have a mental, or an intellectual deficiency to use as an excuse for holding to outrageously stupid views. Another descriptive term for his kind of lunacy I have used is a "dogmatic idiot". Namely, one who is demonstrably smart enough to know better (like getting accepted to a school like Harvard Law), but still belligerently holds to absolutely stupid views, and acts upon them (like going to a school like Harvard Law!). I think Obama wanted to learn how best to circumvent the Constitution to further his socialistic ideals, and he certainly chose the best school to learn that!!!

Anyone who can say with a straight face that I.S.I.S. terrorism does not constitute a threat to America's existence is a colossal idiot, or a blatant liar, one! Certainly, they can't "Nuke" us into ashes, but they can, and apparently intend to create as much murderous domestic chaos as possible, to make us regret attacking them on their "home turf"; with the hope that our voting public will force the president to withdraw our troops, as if that will stop all the domestic terrorism. It won't!!! The only way he can say that I.S.I.S. does not threaten our existence is if he considers the dead we have already suffered, and those that we can expect to suffer in the near future, to be "acceptable losses", in the sense that we must expect casualties on the open field of war. But I'll bet those who have been beheaded already would consider I.S.I.S. to be a bit of a threat to their existence!!!

We are supposedly at war now, but we are not fighting it as if we intended to win it. Our forces are being hamstrung by a policy that amounts to a "holding pattern", which our most-likely-closet-Muslim President will probably force us to deal with for the next year, until he leaves office. He apparently does not want to be remembered as the President responsible for destroying the Muslim "Caliphate", probably because he believes in the Muslim "prophecy" of the "coming Mahdi" (their equivalent of the Messiah).

I learned yesterday, while listening to a terrorism expert on the "700 Club" T.V. show, that their so-called "prophecy" predicts that their "Savior" won't come until a mass-genocide takes place in which all the "infidels" are killed (especially all the Jews, and Christians of the world). Won't they be surprised when God turns their genocidal intentions against each other, until they've destroyed 83 1/3% of their Middle-East invasion force!!! [See Ezekiel 38, &39, for that one!] That's why I can't get upset when I hear statistics about all the American, and European "citizens" who have gone to join I.S.I.S.. The more the merrier, if you ask me! Most of them will most likely not be coming back, after the Lord gets finished with them!!! And those that are already here will surely give pause to any plans to commit murderous havoc after they see that their main international terrorists have destroyed themselves, "upon the mountains of Israel" (Ezekiel 38, & 39). I don't apologize for my obvious appreciation for God's judgement upon these fools. Most have lived in countries where the Gospel is freely preached on television, and I find it hard to believe they were not exposed to the truth, at some point, before they chose to practice Jihad, for "fun and profit", especially against God's Chosen People, Israel! I see no reason to mourn their future passing, especially since they apparently intend to massacre us, as soon as they've finished with Israel. These are not sweet little "alter boys", or whatever the Muslim equivalent would be. By the time they are that far gone, they are murderous monsters. Only a miraculous intervention from God can deliver people like that. And if He's chosen not too, who am I to say He should. After all, the Bible quotes Him as saying, "I will have mercy upon whom I will have mercy." God knows the hearts of those He will choose to save, and those He will not. And I will not try to second guess him on that. I'll just praise Him for choosing to be merciful to me!!!