"All They Need Is More Jobs..."

This not-so-famous "quote", or reasonable facsimile thereof, I think was made by Obama's latest excuse for U.N. Ambassador, whose name I don't recall, at her confirmation hearings. This was in response to a Congressional question concerning her idea of what was needed to stop the international terrorism that the Obama administration can not bring themselves to call "international terrorism", or "Radical Islamic Terrorism", though both terms project accurate descriptions of the movement. This kind of "head in the sand" analysis continues to hamstring all military efforts to defeat I.S.I.S., and other terrorist organizations because you can not defeat something when you keep denying the extent of the problem.

That confirmation hearing should have been immediately stopped, and Obama's appointment should have been immediately rejected, simply because we have enough "clueless" Democrats within the Obama Administration, and they need to try a little harder to find someone who actually is competent to perform her duties, as a representative of this country, and not just another idiot, representing our "idiot" President. (I have said before that I use this term for Obama, not to denigrate his intelligence, which is more than commendable, but to illustrate my disgust for someone of his high intelligence who dogmatically chooses to believe in a lie, or worse, a false ideology. [I consider this to be the worst form of human idiocy; voluntary, almost lunatic idiocy, in spite of obvious evidence to the contrary, these people choose to continue believing what is obviously NOT TRUE! And Hillary is another one.] Because he does so, he surrounds himself with similar dogmatic "idiots", and guess where that leaves our government, as a whole!)

Recently, FOX NEWS had a Democratic spokesperson trying to explain why they don't want to use terms like "Radical Islamic Terrorists". She said it was because using terms like that simply "empower" their movement. I thought the be-headings, and the suicide car-bombings were their real source of "empowerment", if that's what they are looking for, and I doubt that any choice of terms will actually add to their despicable reputations significantly. What the denial of their threat to our peace WILL do is to trivialize our response to their dangerous threat, and make our resolve to resist it a low priority. Unfortunately, I believe that Obama, and his "idiotic Administration" has done precisely that! Our military commanders fear to give an accurate account of the effort to combat terrorism, because they recognize that the military effort is under the heavy-handed control of a bunch of "lunatic" diplomats, who have no concept of reality, let alone the willingness to face the truth. Guess where Hillary falls into these categories???

This is also the basis for the Obama obsession with open immigration, and I'll bet his administration will do everything they can to insure that the recent immigrants are able to vote, legally, or otherwise, in the coming election. And I don't think they can be expected to vote for Trump!!! That may mean that Hillary could become the first elected president of the "United States of Syria, and Iraq"!!!