I have to admit to two things about Donald Trump...I am getting tired of all the easily professed bluster that comes out of his mouth, and if I have to listen to it for the next 4, to 8 years I may go crazy. Of course that's presuming I'm not already, which many have debated with me before, and continue today.
But, strangely, I do appreciate, and agree with, his most controversial position, to date, that of making it a policy not to allow any more immigration of professing Muslim immigrants, which of course we all recognize would be a clear, and irreconcilable violation of the first amendment to the Constitution. There is a point where we have no choice but to accept the fact that the Constitution did not consider all possibilities, and the "Founding Fathers" left open the possibility that there would necessarily be times when the Constitution would not be appropriate for every situation. I think we have found one today!
I think we must pressure Congress, and the state legislatures to amend the Constitution, regrettably, to exclude any religion from immigration to our country whose doctrine not only allows, but encourages the murder of anyone who disagrees with their doctrine, such as Islam (but without specifically naming it). The authors of the Constitution left open the door to amend the Constitution, and the first amendment is in fact the very first example of our doing just that. But the "Founding Fathers" could never have imagined a time when there would be such a diabolical religion that would not only allow for, but also encourage the murdering of others ("seventy -two virgins"; that's not encouragement?) , simply for disagreeing with their doctrine, even encouraging a suicidal effort to "escape" prosecution and imprisonment (as if God is not capable of providing a kind of punishment that is far worse than anything man can devise, and lasts for eternity, with no parole,... ever!), or death penalty for doing so. But, by clarifying this point, we will in effect be preventing a lot of discrimination against Christians, at least here in our own country. This was the main objective of the first amendment, anyway, but the "Founding Fathers" could never have anticipated someone using the first amendment's words to allow a certain kind of religion (Islam) to encourage the very kind of discrimination that the first amendment was obviously intended to protect against. Therefore, since no one can determine which of the Muslim believers will decide to implement this ideology to the harm of innocent people, who peacefully disagree with them, until it's too late to stop them, it is necessary for Islamic beliefs in general to be a disqualifying factor in allowing immigration to this country. As distasteful a concept as this is, in an otherwise free society, we may have no choice but to implement such laws; not because we wish to, but because we are left with no realistic choice.
Further, since we can not punish those who commit murder/suicide, in the name of "Allah", we must take the distasteful step of creating laws that will force the deportation of all immediate family members of those who commit such atrocities. I realize this is not legal, either in our nation's laws, or Biblically condoned, but it is the only way of creating pressure upon these murderous barbarians, to think that their actions will have material consequences that they might find unpleasant to consider, presuming of course they actually care about their family members, which, regrettably, some probably do not. I am not ignoring the Lord's promise to "repay" those who commit such sinful acts. However, my intention is not to punish the sinner; God will be much better at that than we could ever hope to be. But the innocent people will already be killed or hurt, by the time the Lord brings His vengeance upon these idiots. But, at least this may cause SOME to reconsider their lunacy, before they execute their crimes. There must be some way of legally causing these people to reconsider their murderous behavior, BEFORE they commit it! Clearly, their so-called "peaceful religion" (of Islam) in no way discourages this, and even encourages it. Therefore, the only way of protecting at least some of our innocent citizens, is to institute laws that will discourage this unacceptable behavior, before it is committed, even if it is contrary to the "spirit" of both the laws of the land, and the teachings of the Bible. There is no reason for us to allow the blind murder of our citizens, just because we ourselves intend to be law abiding citizens. If they wish to continue their religious beliefs, and practices, let them do so elseware. Period!!! Anyone who does not recognize Islam as a threat to our national security, both domestically, and abroad, is a fool. And we can no longer tolerate such foolishness within our government. We've had nearly 8 years of this foolishness with the Obama administration, and it's time to put a stop to it! (Even if it means we have to listen to a President "Bluster" (Er...I mean, Trump...) [I wonder if Donald is related to the old "Mr. Bluster", of the old "Howdie Doodie Show", I used to watch as a child (six, or seven hundred years ago, I think!)
I would also go so far as to call for laws that would make Islamic beliefs a disqualifying factor in holding public office, at least nationally, and leave it to the state, and local governments to decide if they wish to follow suit! This should also include the federal bureaucracy, since the Democrats are untrustworthy about protecting our citizens from the predatory behavior of our bureaucrats, whom they hire for their presumptive Democratic voting loyalty. (If you don't believe this, consider the I.R.S. and their blatant persecution of various so-called "Tea Party" organizations which applied for 501-C-3 non-profit status, and were turned down, or horribly delayed, simply because they disagreed with the liberal Democratic views of the present administration.) I realize that this position may be too extreme for even the most conservative Christians to accept, but ("should the Lord tarry") we may reach the point where it is necessary to institute such discriminatory laws, simply to protect our own citizens from predatory behavior, that can not receive punishment for their unlawful behavior, because of collective bargaining laws that protect too many predatory bureaucrats (appointees, as well as hired employees).
Case in point!!! Yesterday's news carried the story of the first Muslim election to a major European office, with the election of a Muslim Mayor of London, England! My, aren't they exceedingly "politically correct"!!! And he isn't even pretending to be a Christian, like I am convinced that Obama pretends, even though his policies protect Muslims (homosexuals, and others), at the expense of Christian freedoms, and values. Just wait and see if his administration doesn't do the same thing, locally, in London, that Obama has consistently done here. We will see!
My prevailing point is that the crisis is so dire that exceptional measures must be reasonably considered, whether by Donald Trump, or by whomever is elected president, next year. But, I frankly can't see a Democratic president ever pushing such laws, no matter how critical the need. So, I guess I'll hold my nose, and grit my teeth, and vote for him, if he is the only choice, other than another "Obama-esque" Democrat! And then I'll pray that it doesn't backfire on us, somehow!
Let's be clear, I DO NOT HATE MUSLIMS, nor am I calling for any sweeping discrimination against them. I merely hate the murderous behavior that consistently follows their immigrations to foreign countries that graciously allow them to immigrate to their lands. We all share compassion for their poor, and want to give every opportunity for them to live peaceably, here, or anywhere. But they must recognize that we are not so stupid as to continue allowing them to take our freedoms away from our families, so they can supplant their own "Sharia" laws (which protect only believing Muslims, and are a deadly threat to all others, the so-called "infidels"), for our laws. Their evil behavior forces us to make an unpleasant choice. It's our freedom, or theirs, since they refuse to live peaceably with us. We don't want to choose, but their behavior, and the concurrent approval of their people (even those who would not do the same, themselves) is intolerable any longer! There must be reasonable restraint applied to those who would consider such behavior acceptable, if not for themselves, then for their relatives. They desperately need a reason for self-restraint, since their religion doesn't contain one!
No comments:
Post a Comment