Obama's Divisive Symbolism

I realize that divisiveness is not an impeachable offense, but it is at least a strong indication of the mindset of the person's character involved. Case in point: President Obama has apparently decided that he doesn't want to live in the White House any more. I concur that getting him out of office would be a blessing for all of us, but I'm afraid that's not what he has in mind. He apparently wants to change the White House into the "Rainbow House"!!! At least that's what can be gathered from the way the White House is now being lit up at night with various colors of the rainbow, through floodlights. Every color is apparently acceptable, except for white. After all we can't have the White House actually looking white, not in the city that considers itself the Socialist capital of minority (especially black) America. I guess Obama is publically declaring that he does not consider himself the President of all America, merely the President of minority America; or more specifically the President of black America, and the rest of us know where we can go, as far as he seems to be concerned!

I thought that white was supposed to be the blend, or mixture of all colors. If he wanted to bring this country together, wouldn't white be the color to best symbolize this intent? Therefore, the opposite intent must be true, since he has intentionally decided (or some junior official has decided for him, without his correction) that the "colors" of America's population must be broken apart to create the country that he wants to serve. If this is true, I can't think of a more divisive symbolic gesture from the President of the "United" States of America. Perhaps he would be more comfortable operating out of Moscow. At least he would not have to pretend that he actually cared about this country, from there.

I recognize that on face value the colors of the floodlights that are trained on a building matter little. But the consistency of his administration's perspective in their public policies indicates that this is a very appropriate conclusion to draw from this symbolic gesture. How much more anti-American behavior, and rhetoric must we put up with over the next year and a half, until we are finally rid of this man's twisted, and even "reverse-racist" values posing as the official tenor of American policy?